100 games per page. So at page 2 you have games from ranks 101 to 200.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't care for or about this statistics, but I think that your idea is a decent one and I agree.
Comment has been collapsed.
1,527 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by JJJ7
10 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Lugum
18 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Kratomista
3 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by pb1
2,637 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by drbeckett
26 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by OwieczkaDollyv21
16,853 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by kudomonster
48 Comments - Last post 60 seconds ago by DeliberateTaco
396 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by KOHTYP
105 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by juhaszandor
2,899 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Yamaraus
111 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Deleted2137
1,349 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by Ellendyl
132 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hyrokey
As for now, if there are several games holding the same rank R, the next game will have rank R+1. For instance, three games hold rank 81, and the next game has rank 82. This system has an issue if many games have the same rank. You would think that a game with rank 245 is in top250 of most wanted games, however in fact it is only in top2000 at best. I suggest skipping ranks, which are occupied. So, for the example above three games have real ranks 81, 82, 83 but you display 81 for all three and it is fine because there is no good way to order them. But rank next games according to their real rank, which would be 84, not 82. I think this is a really small change, which adds value to the community wishlist.
Comment has been collapsed.