Giveaway copies in Groups [Closed]

Closed

Since I have not paid attention to it so far when I have assigned copies and I would like to improve my ratio in a few groups, I ask myself the question:

If I give away 2 copies in a GA, do both games contribute to the value difference or just one?

8 months ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

15 Comments

Oppenh4imer

Should be both copies.

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

imminiman

From the FAQ section:

Contributor Value and Levels

After you give away a game 5 times (whether in the same giveaway, or in multiple giveaways), it will begin decreasing in value. The value is decreased by 10% for each additional copy. …

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Aradiel

That's for CV, not group ratio, so irrelevant.

8 months ago*

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

imminiman

I think it is relevant. It works the same way as far as I know.

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Almostn33t

Actually, group ratio doesn't really calculate CV as much as it uses actual values so I think Aradiel is probably correct.

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

imminiman

Ok then, sorry for the mix-up.

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Almostn33t

👍

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

xXShurraXx

👍

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Metalhead8489

yes each copy contributes towards the group value difference. if there are multiple groups the value is divided between the groups(value/number of groups), only the whitelist doesnt count as a seperate group meaning a giveaway shared with 1 group and the whitelist gives full value towards the group.

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Aradiel

I won a WL GA that also included a group I was not a part of. I later joined that group, and my stats showed that I had 1.3 received.

8 months ago

Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

xXShurraXx

I think the value is shared between the groups and is therefore lower.

8 months ago

Permalink